How Roads Impact Wildlife – The Environmental Impact

How Roads Impact Wildlife – The Environmental Impact

Roads have become increasingly common across our globe as people utilize them to travel to places they want to go, increasing the reliability on cars for transportation needs. These large and wide networks of roads we know today severely alter a landscape and can impact wildlife in numerous ways. As seen in my previous blog posts, roads can cause impacts to wildlife such as mortality, wildlife-vehicle collisions, and limit their movement from place to place; however, roads can also shift the population demographic of a wildlife species and become a source of pollution into the environment. Roads impacts extend well beyond the surface of the road itself, causing many ecological impacts to the environment and the wildlife within it.

Habitat Fragmentation & Alteration

Roads can cause direct mortality to wildlife, causing other factors to occur such as wildlife shifting their population demographic farther away from the road, losing vital habitat space. Roads also pose a number of indirect effects onto wildlife, such as habitat fragmentation and alteration. This is due to either wildlife not being able to cross a road due to the risks of mortality or through avoiding the road altogether, shifting their habitat farther away.

Roads also create barriers that limit the movement of wildlife, one of the main issues being barriers prohibit gene flow. An example of this was seen when a group of researchers studied the genetics in timber snakes; snakes that were blocked in their movement from roads had a much lower genetic diversity than other snakes across continuous habitat types. Along with this, the male timber snakes are known to follow pheromone trails to find mates; roads disturb this trail and make it difficult for the males to be able to find mates, affecting reproduction and survival of the species.

Wildlife being affected from habitat fragmentation and alteration are also susceptible to not being able to access specific habitats. An example of this is during dry seasons; when there is a drought occurring, road prohibit wildlife from reaching vital water sources. Roads can also prevent some wildlife from reaching nesting sites, such as turtles; these species end up laying their eggs in habitats where there is more predation, meaning their is a decreased chance of reproductive success and survival of the species.

Constructing a road also alters the habitat altogether. If a road is running through a forest, the road creates an edge habitat along the parts of the road that fringe the forest itself. This can have severe consequences for wildlife, especially birds; when an edge habitat is created, birds become more susceptible to predation. This is due to predators being able to prey on birds much easier in the edge habitat, as the forest canopy at the edge offers less protection to the birds and their nests. Other wildlife susceptible to edge habitats are turtles; some species of turtle prefer to nest along edge habitats because it is an ideal habitat for their nest. However, turtles utilizing the edge habitat are now posed to a greater risk of mortality when crossing roads, and their hatchlings could also be susceptible to this when they disperse after hatching from the nest.

Pollution

While roads can alter habitats and cause fragmentation to occur, they can also channel pollutants onto the environment. Debris from tires on the road can cause things such as a decreased amount of time to metamorphosis for the wood frog species. Salt that is used to deice roads runs off the road and into adjacent ponds that can decrease the survivorship of species such as spotted salamanders and wood frogs. Deicing salts can also change frogs behavior and decrease their performance in locomotion. Frogs are one the species that have been shown to have greater skeletal abnormalities when they are closer to roads; researchers suggest this is a result from the road contamination. This is turn affects the frogs fitness, making them potentially less adept to catch prey or elude themselves away from predators.

Roads polluting the environment extend far beyond introducing chemicals into the environment; they also introduce noise and light, which can be detrimental to wildlife as well. The noise from traffic on a road can effect species of bird, causing declines in bird populations living in proximity habitats close to the road. However, not all species of bird are equally affected, such as how birds having song frequencies similar to that of a car frequency being found as absent from habitats near roadsides. Noise from a road can also change bird species’ community composition, meaning that some species of birds are differentially excluded from a particular habitat near a road.

Along with noise polluting the environment, light can as well. Some species of wildlife rely on light to control biological activities, and this can be impacted by lights along a road. For example, robins use sunlight as a cue to begin their morning songs and can mistake lights on a road for the sun and begin their song in the middle of the night. Lights from roads can also alter flying routes for bats, as well as expose some frog species to artificial light during the night that could delay their metamorphosis time. Along with this, sea turtle hatchlings use light in order to navigate themselves to the sea and can become confused by lights on a road and go toward a road instead of the ocean; this can cause the hatchlings to die from dehydration, predators, and /or wildlife-vehicle collisions, and they will never reach the ocean. This goes for the females that nest their hatchlings as well, sometimes becoming disoriented from road lights and have a difficult time getting back to the ocean.

A final note on pollution from roads is that is can facilitate the spread of invasive species when land is cleared for a road. An example of this was seen in Australia with cane toads; these species of toad are very invasive in the continent and use roadside areas to move, causing an increase in their range as a population. Along with this, species such as fire ants may also build their mounding nests by areas cleared for roads because this is an ideal habitat for them. Roads can facilitate the invasion of invasive species, and alter or fragment a habitat; all of this impacts are detrimental to both wildlife and the land they live in.

Mitigation Strategies

There are numerous solutions and mitigation strategies being developed to help decrease the amount of harmful impacts our roads cause to wildlife. In instances where the pattern of mortality can be predicted for a specific are during a specific time of year, roads are either closed or reduced in their speed limits to decrease the rates of wildlife mortality. Another solution is creating artificial nesting sites for gravid species that need them; this can reduce species from needing to potentially cross a road, the distance they need to travel, and/or their chances of mortality.

A main issue with roads is the traffic volume on them. Though decreasing traffic volume is not very likely to be effective for a mitigation strategy, constructing alternative methods to cross a road could become more successful. For example, culverts can be used for smaller animals to allow for a safe passage under a roadway; this has been shown to be highly effective in decreasing mortality rates of wildlife. For bigger animals, overpasses can be used to cross a road; this overpass would need to have specific features of the wildlife’s environment, such as vegetation planted over it to mimic the habitat type.

There are many factors that need to be taken into consideration when ensuring wildlife can effectively and efficiently cross our road structures. We need to implement and create new ways to protect and preserve our wildlife, as well as the environment they live in. From this post, we have learned that roads not only impact wildlife through things such as mortality or vehicle collisions, but roads also create very real and severe threats to the environment that in turn affect wildlife. We as humans have a job of conserving our planet, and that includes the wildlife within it. Without the wildlife, there would not be an environment for us to destruct upon, as wildlife naturally disperse seeds, nutrients, and vital resources the environment needs to keep going.

“We are part of the environment, just as much as wild animals are. They do not seek to kill us, we seek to kill them. It’s surely our responsibility to do everything within our power to create a planet that provides a home not just for us, but for all life on Earth.” – David Attenborough.

How Roads Impact Wildlife – Indirect Effects to Our Wildlife Species

Roads impact wildlife in a variety of ways, as seen through my many blog posts concerning this topic and issue. However, the one major thing I have not yet discussed about how roads impact wildlife is exactly what happens to our wildlife in terms of their diversity and size. Roads can cause a chain effect of reactions to occur in the environment, including diminishing species one by one, gradually decreasing the size of their population.

Wildlife are Gradually Disappearing

Major transportation infrastructures (i.e., roads, railways, and canals) are impacting our wildlife across an array of linear landscapes, making wildlife become disproportionate to the area of habitat they occupy. As we know, roads impose an array of impacts to wildlife, including wildlife mortality, wildlife-vehicle collisions, and limited movement from habitat to habitat. However, what is of major concern is the indirect effects roads cause to our wildlife populations, such as reduced access to habitat due to road avoidance or human exploitation. The indirect effects are the ones of major concern, especially those occurring from bigger transportation infrastructures such as highways. Highways present more serious and harmful threats to wildlife and impact a much larger range of wildlife species, presenting impassable barriers for species to move around their environment. The major concerns of highways, and transportation infrastructures in general, and their indirect effects include, but are not limited to, direct loss of habitat, degradation of habitat quality, road avoidance, and human exploitation.

The Indirect Effects

Direct loss of habitat is one of the indirect effects wildlife experience from our roads and highways. Construction of major transportation infrastructures changes the value of the habitat within the landscape. Areas that used to flourish in the environment that are now covered by pavement, rails, or travel lanes with dirt and/or gravel are now vastly diminished to be used by wildlife as habitat. Transportation infrastructures also cause the quality of a habitat to degrade, causing things such as storm water discharge, alterations in stream hydrology, air emissions, and invasive plant species to occur; this can degrade a habitat not just where the transportation infrastructure is placed, but several hundred meters or even miles away from the road itself.

Due to roads running through wildlife habitat or landscapes wildlife use, wildlife become accustomed to avoid roads. Some species of wildlife will avoid areas adjacent or close to highways or roads due to the amount of noise and/or human activity associated with roads in general. Avoiding areas near roads can cause wildlife to be restricted in their ability to move around in their environment, limit the resources they can access, and limit the amount of food they are able to forage for. Roads are also associated with human activity to wildlife, which means increased human exploitation in these areas; roads increase the access for humans to hunt or poach in the environment. This effect can potentially cause wildlife populations near roadway areas to be vastly reduced, leading to wildlife becoming more road avoidant in the future. How can these indirect effects to wildlife from roads be resolved, even just a little, to help our species of the earth?

The Solution to the Indirect Effects

Based off an article I found about this issue imposed onto our wildlife, there are already progressions being made with resolutions to the issue of indirect effects from road systems. One solution is to foster a greater appreciation for the issues caused by highways and railways; this is a challenge currently because it emphasizes the understanding people need to have for the scope and complexity transportation infrastructures pose on wildlife. The issue is sometimes too often viewed as incidental to the animal rather than a threat to wildlife populations. Wildlife must be able to move throughout their landscapes as it is one of the most important ecological processes that needs to be maintained for ecosystems to stay intact over time. Being able to foster an appreciation for this issue is important, as it could lead to appropriate planning and mitigation when roads are being constructed to prevent long-term degradation of wildlife populations and their habitats.

Another solution to this issue to be able to analyze the landscape’s connectivity zones; what this means is when a road is being planned for construction, comprehensive efforts must be taken to acknowledge and leave be the areas in the landscape that are deemed important travel corridors or connections for wildlife between significant habitat areas. If these steps are taken, planning for new transportation infrastructures can be more effectively and efficiently focused on how to minimize and mitigate the impacts to critical areas wildlife use. Though these solutions are still in the making, the causes of indirect effects from roads onto wildlife is an important topic that needs to be explored so we still have the wildlife we love and see all over the world.

css.php